Weber

(Danis-Weber) classification of fibular ankle fractures

Per-ankle label determined only by the fibular fracture level relative to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: A below, B at and C above. The type does not by itself prove syndesmotic or deltoid integrity, mortise stability, prognosis or need for surgery; report those findings independently.

vigenteWeber / ankle-trauma literatureWeber 1972 level classification; stability and care context reviewed through 20181972XR, CT

Aplicar o Weber a um achado

Descreva o achado como no laudo. A resposta aponta uma das categorias publicadas, com a probabilidade e o trecho que a decide.

O texto não é armazenado. Remova nomes, documentos e contatos.

Categorias

Reescritas a partir da fonte e citadas
A
1 de 3

Weber A, infrasyndesmotic fibular fracture

Weber A: the fibular fracture is below the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (infrasyndesmotic). Assign the letter from level only; do not encode mortise stability or declare the syndesmosis and deltoid ligament intact without their own evidence.

CondutaAssess deformity, open injury, neurovascular status, mortise congruence, medial and posterior malleoli and syndesmotic or proximal-fibular injury independently. A fracture proven stable may follow a functional or nonoperative pathway, but type A alone does not forbid surgery or prove that pathway appropriate.
RiscoThe distal level is an anatomic descriptor, not a guarantee of stability or a calibrated probability of displacement, nonunion, arthritis or good outcome. Coexisting medial, posterior, osteochondral or ligamentous injury can dominate risk.
verificadoStability in ankle fractures: Diagnosis and treatmentWeber 1972 monograph bibliographic record for classification lineage; Lampridis et al., PMC5994620, Danis-Weber level definitions and stability limitations; BOAST 12 standards for assessment, reduction, imaging and stability-based care.
B
2 de 3

Weber B, transsyndesmotic fibular fracture

Weber B: the fibular fracture crosses or is centered at the level of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (transsyndesmotic), often oblique or spiral. The letter alone does not determine deltoid, syndesmotic or mortise integrity.

CondutaEstablish stability from mortise and medial-column findings, supported weight-bearing radiographs when clinically appropriate, and stress or operative assessment when indicated. Many isolated Weber B fractures are stable and nonoperative; unstable patterns may require fixation, but the letter neither mandates nor excludes surgery.
RiscoType B spans stable and unstable injuries and has no patient-specific complication probability. The same fibular level can coexist with different medial and syndesmotic injuries, so raw findings and stability evidence are more informative than the letter alone.
verificadoStability in ankle fractures: Diagnosis and treatmentLampridis et al., EFORT Open Rev 2018, DOI 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170057, stability diagnosis, weight-bearing radiographs and treatment discussion; Hermans et al., PMC3368108, limited sensitivity of level classification for syndesmotic injury; BOAST 12, uncertain-stability review standard.
C
3 de 3

Weber C, suprasyndesmotic fibular fracture

Weber C: the fibular fracture is above the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (suprasyndesmotic). Examine and image the entire fibula when a proximal or Maisonneuve pattern is possible, but do not infer definite syndesmotic widening, deltoid rupture or mortise instability solely from the level.

CondutaUrgently reduce a deformed or neurovascularly threatened ankle and assess the mortise, medial column, posterior malleolus and syndesmosis directly. An unstable mortise or syndesmosis may require operative stabilization, yet type C itself does not mandate ORIF, select an implant or define operative levels.
RiscoA proximal fibular level is associated with concern for a more extensive injury pattern, but it is an imperfect proxy for actual ligament disruption and carries no calibrated individual probability of instability, arthritis, reoperation or functional loss.
verificadoStability in ankle fractures: Diagnosis and treatmentLampridis et al., PMC5994620, suprasyndesmotic definition and stability limitations; Hermans et al., DOI 10.1007/s00256-011-1284-2, MRI correlation showing level classification does not sensitively exclude syndesmotic injury; BOAST 12, whole-leg imaging, urgent reduction and syndesmotic assessment standards.
Lógica de decisão estruturada

Classify fibular fracture level only. Report mortise, medial column, posterior malleolus, syndesmosis, proximal fibula and urgency separately; no Weber type is inherently a treatment order.

{
  "categories": [
    {
      "outcome_code": "A",
      "fibular_fracture_level": "below_distal_tibiofibular_syndesmosis",
      "synonym": "infrasyndesmotic"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "B",
      "fibular_fracture_level": "at_distal_tibiofibular_syndesmosis",
      "synonym": "transsyndesmotic"
    },
    {
      "outcome_code": "C",
      "fibular_fracture_level": "above_distal_tibiofibular_syndesmosis",
      "synonym": "suprasyndesmotic"
    }
  ],
  "applicability": {
    "use_for": "An acute ankle-region injury with an identifiable fibular fracture whose level can be compared with the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.",
    "classification_unit": "one_ankle_with_one_index_fibular_fracture_level",
    "required_inputs": [
      "side",
      "complete_ankle_radiographs_including_mortise_and_true_lateral",
      "fibular_fracture_level",
      "mortise_alignment",
      "medial_malleolus_and_deltoid_assessment",
      "posterior_malleolus_assessment",
      "syndesmosis_assessment",
      "proximal_fibula_assessment_when_indicated"
    ],
    "outside_scope": [
      "isolated_medial_malleolus_fracture_without_fibular_fracture",
      "isolated_posterior_malleolus_fracture_without_fibular_fracture",
      "no_identifiable_fibular_fracture",
      "pediatric_physeal_or_transitional_fracture_requiring_another_system",
      "chronic_posttraumatic_deformity",
      "treatment_selection_from_type_alone"
    ]
  },
  "assignment_algorithm": [
    {
      "if": "fibular_fracture_is_distal_to_the_syndesmotic_level",
      "output_code": "A"
    },
    {
      "if": "fibular_fracture_crosses_or_is_centered_at_the_syndesmotic_level",
      "output_code": "B"
    },
    {
      "if": "fibular_fracture_is_proximal_to_the_syndesmotic_level",
      "output_code": "C"
    },
    {
      "if": "no_fibular_fracture_or_level_is_not_assessable",
      "output": "Weber_not_assignable"
    }
  ],
  "decisive_boundaries": {
    "level_only": "Assign A, B or C from fibular fracture level only. Do not change the category because the mortise appears stable or unstable.",
    "no_assumed_ligament_state": "The type does not establish whether the syndesmosis or deltoid ligament is intact, partially injured or completely disrupted.",
    "no_forced_category": "An isolated medial or posterior malleolar fracture and an ankle injury without a fibular fracture do not receive a Weber type.",
    "proximal_fibula_rule": "If the ankle pattern or medial clear-space findings raise concern for a high fibular injury, image and examine the whole fibula for a Maisonneuve pattern rather than assuming type B from the ankle field of view."
  },
  "stability_assessment_separate_from_type": {
    "direct_report_fields": [
      "mortise_congruence",
      "talar_shift",
      "medial_clear_space_and_technique",
      "medial_malleolus_fracture",
      "deltoid_injury_evidence",
      "posterior_malleolus_size_morphology_and_displacement",
      "tibiofibular_clear_space_and_overlap",
      "proximal_fibular_fracture",
      "open_injury",
      "neurovascular_status",
      "soft_tissue_condition"
    ],
    "weight_bearing_role": "For an isolated distal fibular fracture of uncertain stability, current practice may use weight-bearing radiographs when clinically appropriate rather than assuming stability from a non-weight-bearing Weber label.",
    "stress_and_intraoperative_role": "Stress imaging or intraoperative syndesmotic testing belongs to the stability evaluation and must be reported separately from the Weber type.",
    "CT_role": "CT is useful for complex patterns, posterior malleolar involvement, plafond extension or preoperative morphology; CT does not redefine A, B or C away from the fibular level rule."
  },
  "risk_interpretation": {
    "anatomic_association": "More proximal fracture levels can be associated with more extensive soft-tissue injury, but Weber type is an imperfect proxy for actual syndesmotic and medial-column integrity.",
    "cohort_limit": "In one 51-patient MRI study, the radiographic Weber/AO level classification had 47 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity for syndesmotic injury; these cohort estimates are not a patient's probability and show why level alone cannot exclude ligament injury.",
    "no_personal_prognosis": "No type supplies a calibrated individual probability of displacement, nonunion, post-traumatic arthritis, reoperation or functional outcome."
  },
  "management_boundary": {
    "immediate_actions_from_findings": "Open injury, neurovascular compromise or deformity requiring urgent reduction is managed from those findings, not from the Weber letter.",
    "stable_pathway": "A fracture proven stable may follow a functional or nonoperative pathway under the applicable protocol, regardless of a simplistic type stereotype.",
    "uncertain_pathway": "When stability is uncertain, arrange timely clinical review and supported stability imaging rather than declaring type A stable or type C operative by definition.",
    "unstable_pathway": "An unstable mortise or syndesmosis may require operative stabilization after patient-specific assessment, but the Weber letter alone does not mandate fixation, choose implants or define the surgical plan.",
    "BOAST_context": "BOAST recommends urgent reduction and splintage for deformity, true lateral and mortise radiographs, whole-leg imaging when a proximal fibular injury is suspected, weight bearing as tolerated for stable fractures, review with weight-bearing radiographs for uncertain stability, and direct assessment of syndesmotic stability when treating an unstable mortise."
  },
  "system_collision_boundary": {
    "AO_OTA_44": "AO/OTA 44A, 44B and 44C expand ankle fracture morphology beyond the base Weber level labels. Preserve the named system and do not silently equate every AO/OTA subtype with a complete Weber diagnosis.",
    "Lauge_Hansen": "Lauge-Hansen describes inferred mechanism and injury stage. Weber describes fibular level. Similar-looking patterns do not permit an automatic crosswalk without reconstructing all component injuries.",
    "Maisonneuve": "Maisonneuve is a named injury pattern with proximal fibular and syndesmotic or medial injury; report the full pattern rather than using C as its only description."
  },
  "agent_output_contract": [
    "Return side, examination views and whether the entire fibula was assessed when a proximal injury is possible.",
    "Return fibular fracture level, orientation, displacement and the named Weber type.",
    "Return mortise congruence, talar shift, medial and posterior malleolar findings, syndesmotic indicators and proximal fibular findings as independent fields.",
    "Return open or closed status, neurovascular findings and soft-tissue urgency separately when available.",
    "State whether stability is established, uncertain or unstable and identify the evidence; never infer it from the letter alone.",
    "Keep AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen labels separate and do not turn the type into prognosis or an operative order."
  ],
  "missing_input_behavior": [
    "If the fibular fracture level is outside the field of view, request appropriate ankle or whole-leg imaging rather than forcing A, B or C.",
    "If no fibular fracture exists, return Weber_not_assignable and describe the actual medial, posterior or ligamentous injury.",
    "If mortise stability is unresolved, return stability_uncertain and the next supported assessment rather than using the Weber type as a substitute.",
    "If only a Weber letter is supplied, do not infer syndesmotic disruption, deltoid injury, mortise stability, treatment or prognosis."
  ],
  "supporting_sources": [
    {
      "role": "historical_classification",
      "citation": "Weber BG. Die Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes. 1972",
      "url": "https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000795807421952"
    },
    {
      "role": "stability_and_management_review",
      "citation": "Lampridis et al. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3:294-303",
      "doi": "10.1302/2058-5241.3.170057",
      "pmcid": "PMC5994620"
    },
    {
      "role": "ligament_prediction_limit",
      "citation": "Hermans et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:787-801",
      "doi": "10.1007/s00256-011-1284-2",
      "pmcid": "PMC3368108"
    },
    {
      "role": "current_trauma_standard",
      "citation": "BOAST 12: The Management of Ankle Fractures. 2016",
      "url": "https://www.boa.ac.uk/resource/boast-12-pdf.html"
    }
  ],
  "source_locator": "Weber 1972 monograph bibliographic record for lineage; Lampridis et al. 2018, PMC5994620, classification limitations, stability assessment, weight-bearing radiographs and treatment discussion; Hermans et al. 2012, PMC3368108, MRI correlation and sensitivity/specificity; BOAST 12, standards 1-16 for acute assessment, imaging, stability and syndesmosis."
}

Referência, não é dispositivo médico. Confira a publicação primária vigente. O radiologista que assina o laudo continua autor e responsável.