Incomplete comparison
Incomplete comparison for a new posttreatment baseline when a required prior examination is known or expected to become available. This is distinct from P-x or N-x technical nonassessability.
Post-definitive-treatment surveillance framework assigning primary-site and neck categories separately: 0 incomplete, 1 no evidence, 2 low suspicion with primary 2a/2b branches, 3 high suspicion and 4 proven or definite progression. P-x/N-x and unknown-primary states are qualifiers, not ordinal scores. The category supports standardized next-step communication but does not diagnose recurrence, collapse P and N, or supply a universal patient-level recurrence probability.
Descreva o achado como no laudo. A resposta aponta uma das categorias publicadas, com a probabilidade e o trecho que a decide.
Incomplete comparison for a new posttreatment baseline when a required prior examination is known or expected to become available. This is distinct from P-x or N-x technical nonassessability.
No evidence of recurrence at the assessed primary site or neck: normal or expected posttreatment anatomy and change without a suspicious focal mucosal, deep or nodal abnormality.
Low suspicion. At the primary site, 2a is a focal non-mass-like mucosal enhancement or focal reduced-diffusion abnormality suitable for direct inspection, whereas 2b is a deep ill-defined nonnodular abnormality. In the neck, category 2 includes equivocal residual enhancement or uptake, a new or enlarging node without definitively malignant morphology, or meaningful modality discordance.
High suspicion based on a discrete enhancing mass matching the tumor bed, intense focal FDG uptake compatible with tumor, progressive perineural abnormality, or a highly suspicious and concordantly progressive nodal finding.
Pathologically proven residual or recurrent tumor, or definite radiologic progression supported by concordant clinical evidence when the multidisciplinary team determines that tissue confirmation is unnecessary or infeasible.
Return separate P and N assessments, preserve modality/release, and never turn suspicion into pathology, a universal recurrence probability or an autonomous treatment order.
{
"categories": [
{
"outcome_code": "0",
"label": "incomplete",
"defining_state": "new_baseline_without_required_prior_imaging_that_is_known_or_expected_to_become_available"
},
{
"outcome_code": "1",
"label": "no_evidence_of_recurrence",
"defining_state": "expected_posttreatment_findings_without_suspicious_primary_site_or_neck_abnormality"
},
{
"outcome_code": "2",
"label": "low_suspicion",
"primary_site_subcategories": [
"2a_mucosal",
"2b_deep"
],
"neck_subcategory": "N2"
},
{
"outcome_code": "3",
"label": "high_suspicion",
"defining_state": "discrete_or_progressive_abnormality_highly_suspicious_for_viable_tumor"
},
{
"outcome_code": "4",
"label": "known_or_definite_recurrence",
"defining_state": "pathologically_proven_disease_or_definite_radiologic_and_clinical_progression"
}
],
"applicability": {
"intended_use": "Standardized posttreatment imaging surveillance after definitive or curative-intent treatment of head and neck cancer.",
"classification_unit": "one_examination_with_separate_primary_site_P_and_neck_N_assessments",
"required_context": [
"tumor_primary_site_and_histology",
"treatment_type_and_completion_date",
"baseline_and_prior_imaging",
"clinical_examination_or_endoscopy_when_relevant",
"modality_and_protocol",
"separate_primary_site_and_neck_findings"
],
"outside_scope": [
"during_active_treatment_response_scoring",
"untreated_initial_staging",
"pathologic_diagnosis_from_imaging_category",
"single_combined_P_and_N_category",
"automatic_treatment_selection"
]
},
"separate_axes_and_qualifiers": {
"primary_site_axis": "Assign a P category to the treated primary site and use the primary-specific 2a versus 2b branch when category 2 applies.",
"neck_axis": "Assign an N category to treated cervical nodes and the neck independently; the category may legitimately differ from P.",
"unassessable": "Use P-x or N-x when the relevant region cannot be assessed because of technique, artifact, coverage or anatomy. The x qualifier is not category 0 and is not an ordinal risk score.",
"unknown_primary": "Use the declared unknown-primary convention rather than inventing a primary-site category when no treated primary exists.",
"no_collapse_rule": "Never return one overall NI-RADS number by taking the higher or lower of P and N unless an explicitly named local implementation requires a separate summary outside the ACR axes."
},
"category_logic": {
"category_0": {
"gate": "Use only when a new baseline examination lacks a prior study that is known or expected to become available for comparison.",
"action": "Issue an incomplete comparison state and add an addendum after the prior examination becomes available.",
"distinction": "Technical nonassessability is P-x or N-x, not category 0; absence of any prior when none will be available is handled by clinical judgment rather than perpetual category 0."
},
"category_1": {
"primary_and_neck": "Expected posttreatment anatomy, fibrosis, edema or other stable benign change without a suspicious focus.",
"action": "Continue routine surveillance according to the cancer, treatment, timepoint and institutional pathway."
},
"category_2": {
"P_2a_mucosal": "Focal non-mass-like mucosal enhancement or focal reduced diffusion that is low suspicion and accessible to direct clinical inspection.",
"P_2a_action": "Recommend direct visual inspection or endoscopic correlation rather than treating 2a as a biopsy-proven recurrence.",
"P_2b_deep": "Deep ill-defined nonnodular soft tissue or another equivocal deep posttreatment abnormality without a discrete high-suspicion mass.",
"P_2b_action": "Recommend short-interval imaging; MRI is preferred for suspected perineural spread or skull-base evaluation when appropriate.",
"N_2": "Residual heterogeneous enhancement, mild-to-moderate FDG uptake, a new or enlarging node without definitively malignant morphology, or meaningful PET/MRI discordance.",
"N_2_action": "Recommend short-interval imaging and integrate morphology, diffusion, metabolic activity, trajectory and clinical findings."
},
"category_3": {
"any_of": [
"discrete_enhancing_mass_matching_the_tumor_bed",
"intense_focal_FDG_uptake_compatible_with_tumor",
"progressive_or_increasing_perineural_abnormality",
"node_with_highly_suspicious_morphology_or_concordant_progression"
],
"action": "Recommend image-guided or clinical biopsy when clinically indicated and technically feasible; multidisciplinary review can resolve contraindication, inaccessible site or overwhelming concordant evidence."
},
"category_4": {
"any_of": [
"pathologically_proven_residual_or_recurrent_tumor",
"definite_radiologic_progression_with_concordant_clinical_evidence_when_tissue_is_unnecessary_or_not_feasible"
],
"action": "Route to multidisciplinary clinical management while preserving site, extent and proof basis; category 4 is not a treatment regimen."
}
},
"modality_and_version_boundary": {
"CT_and_PET_CT": "Use the 2018 ACR white-paper framework and its modality-specific descriptors.",
"MRI": "Use the current MRI v2025 release and its assessment-category table; do not assume every CT/PET descriptor has identical MRI wording.",
"longitudinal_consistency": "State the release and modality used whenever comparison or automation could mix implementations.",
"PET_limitation": "Inflammation, physiologic uptake and treatment timing can mimic disease; metabolic intensity must be integrated with anatomy and trajectory."
},
"decisive_boundaries": {
"zero_versus_x": "Category 0 means comparison is incomplete because a required prior is expected; x means the anatomy is unassessable on the current examination.",
"one_versus_two": "Expected stable posttreatment change without a focal concern is 1; a focal low-suspicion mucosal, deep or nodal abnormality is 2.",
"P_2a_versus_P_2b": "A mucosal focus suitable for direct inspection is 2a; a deep ill-defined nonnodular abnormality requiring imaging surveillance is 2b.",
"two_versus_three": "Equivocal low-suspicion change without a discrete convincing tumor pattern is 2; a discrete mass, intense concordant uptake or convincing progression is 3.",
"three_versus_four": "High imaging suspicion awaiting confirmation is 3; pathology or definite radiologic-plus-clinical progression is 4."
},
"risk_interpretation": {
"qualitative_only": "The ordinal category communicates suspicion and linked workup, not a universal recurrence percentage.",
"why_probabilities_vary": [
"primary_versus_neck_axis",
"CT_PET_CT_or_MRI_release",
"tumor_site_and_histology",
"time_since_treatment",
"prevalence_and_referral_setting",
"reader_and_followup_reference_standard"
],
"prohibited_inferences": [
"category_1_equals_zero_recurrence_risk",
"category_2_has_one_portable_percentage",
"category_3_is_pathology",
"category_4_selects_a_regimen"
]
},
"agent_output_contract": [
"Return treatment type, completion date, modality, protocol, current release and comparison adequacy.",
"Return P and N separately and use 2a or 2b only on the primary-site axis.",
"Describe the exact mucosal, deep, nodal, diffusion, enhancement, FDG and trajectory evidence before the category.",
"Return category-linked next step as a recommendation with clinical and technical qualifiers.",
"Distinguish 0, P-x or N-x, unknown primary, suspicion, proof and treatment selection."
],
"missing_input_behavior": [
"If a known prior will become available, return category 0 and an addendum pathway rather than a false definitive category.",
"If the primary site or neck is technically unassessable, return P-x or N-x for that axis and still classify the other axis when possible.",
"If treatment status is not post-definitive surveillance, withhold NI-RADS and route to the appropriate staging or response framework.",
"If P-2a versus P-2b cannot be resolved, expose the ambiguity and the finding location rather than collapsing it to a generic 2 without explanation."
],
"supporting_sources": [
{
"role": "CT_PET_framework",
"citation": "Aiken et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1097-1108",
"doi": "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.006"
},
{
"role": "current_MRI_release",
"citation": "Aiken et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025",
"doi": "10.1016/j.jacr.2025.07.023"
},
{
"role": "official_release_index",
"citation": "ACR NI-RADS current-release page",
"url": "https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/NI-RADS"
}
],
"source_locator": "ACR NI-RADS MRI v2025 Assessment Categories table for 0, 1, primary 2a/2b, neck 2, 3, 4 and x qualifiers; Aiken et al. 2018, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.006, CT/PET white paper; ACR current-release index."
}Referência, não é dispositivo médico. Confira a publicação primária vigente. O radiologista que assina o laudo continua autor e responsável.